4.5 Article

Patient monitoring and follow-up in lentiviral clinical trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 78-82

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2691

Keywords

clinical trials; lentiviral vectors; safety monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Lentiviral vectors are being used with increasing frequency in human clinical trials. We were the first to use lentiviral vectors in clinical trials in 2003. Our lentiviral vector encoded a long RNA antisense sequence to the HIV-1 envelope and was used in an ex vivo autologous setting to provide viral load control in HIV-1 positive subjects failing anti-HIV therapy. A total of 65 subjects have been treated in Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials in six institutions. Methods Good manufacturing practices (GMP) lots of the lentiviral vector used in our clinical trials were assayed for the presence of replication competent lentivirus (RCL). RCL assays were conducted at two stages. The first testing was performed on samples collected immediately following bulk harvest of the GMP product lot and consisted of 1x108 cells used in production. RCL assays were also performed on aliquots of the final fill of the vector by the inoculation of at least 5% of the GMP final fill volume into C8166 cells, passaged for at least ten passages and tested for RCL by p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and vesicular stomatitis virus-G envelope DNA. Results Following 263 infusions of autologous, transduced cells, no adverse events have been detected in these subjects, with some followed for more than 8years following infusions. More than 4.3x1012 VRX496 proviral copies were administered to these 65 subjects. Conclusions Data from this small population suggest that there is no apparent risk for serious adverse events with the use of lentiviral vectors. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available