4.5 Article

A comparative analysis of constitutive and cell-specific promoters in the adult mouse hippocampus using lentivirus vector-mediated gene transfer

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 1163-1175

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1249

Keywords

beta-galactosidase; cell-specific promoters; lentiviral vectors; mouse hippocampus; X-gal staining

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 NS 044832]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Viral vectors provide powerful tools for transgene delivery to the mammalian brain to assess the effects of therapeutic proteins, antisense RNAs or small interfering RNAs. A key advantage of such approaches is that specific brain regions implicated in a particular disease can be independently targeted. Methods To optimize transgene expression in sub-regions of the mouse hippocampus and with a view towards devising gene therapy strategies for Alzheimer's disease, we designed lentivirus-based reporter vectors bearing various promoters, including constitutive and cell-specific promoters. Furthermore, we devised methods allowing a side-by-side comparison of transgene expression levels in neural cells both in vitro and in vivo. Results Following stereotaxic injection into the adult mouse hippocampus, titer-adjusted lentiviral vectors bearing constitutive promoters resulted in robust and sub-region-specific transgene expression. Our results show that the human CMV-IE promoter resulted in efficient transgene expression in the entire hippocampus whereas transgene expression mediated by the hybrid hEF1 alpha/HTLV promoter was limited mainly in the dentate gyrus and the CA2/3 region. Finally, the neuron-specific human synapsin I promoter was particularly effective in the dentate gyrus. Conclusions These findings indicate that subregion-specific transgene expression in the hippocampus can be achieved following lentivirus vector-mediated gene transfer. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available