4.5 Article

The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1176-1185

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4

Keywords

Postoperative anastomotic leak; Colorectal surgery; Health economics; Length of stay; Cost

Funding

  1. Ethicon, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery. Retrospective data (January 2008 to December 2010) were analyzed from patients who had colorectal surgery with and without postoperative leaks, using the Premier Perspective (TM) database. Data on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), re-admissions, postoperative infection, and costs were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the propensity score matching (PSM) and generalized linear models (GLM). Of the patients, 6,174 (6.18 %) had anastomotic leaks within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Patients with leaks had 1.3 times higher 30-day re-admission rates and 0.8-1.9 times higher postoperative infection rates as compared with patients without leaks (P < 0.001 for both). Anastomotic leaks incurred additional LOS and hospital costs of 7.3 days and $24,129, respectively, only within the first hospitalization. Per 1,000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks-including hospitalization and re-admission-was established as 9,500 days in prolonged LOS and $28.6 million in additional costs. Similar results were obtained from both the PSM and GLM for assessing total costs for hospitalization and re-admission. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery increase the total clinical and economic burden by a factor of 0.6-1.9 for a 30-day re-admission, postoperative infection, LOS, and hospital costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available