4.8 Article

Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from glucose using aluminium doped MCM-41 silica as acid catalyst

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 70-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.002

Keywords

Aluminium doped MCM-41 silica; 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural; Glucose dehydration; Levulinic acid

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2012-38204-C03-02]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [P09-FQM-5070, RNM-1565]
  3. FEDER (European Union)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous aluminium doped MCM-41 silica catalysts were prepared by a sol-gel method in two reaction steps (acid and alkaline hydrolysis) from joint hydrolysis of tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS) and aluminium triisoproxide, using n-dodecylammonium chloride as surfactant, at room temperature, and subsequent calcination at 550 degrees C. Two solids with different Si/Al molar ratios (5 and 10) were synthesized, which possess high specific surface area and acidity, with both Bronsted and Lewis acid sites. By using a biphasic water/MIBK as reaction medium and a 30 wt.% of the 10Al-MCM catalyst with respect to the substrate weight (glucose), 87% of glucose conversion and 36% of HMF yield were achieved at 195 degrees C after 150 min of reaction time. The reaction is quite selective toward HMF, since only fructose was detected as by-product, but neither levulinic acid nor furfural were found. Moreover, the use of a sodium chloride aqueous solution (20 wt.%) and MIBK ameliorates the partition coefficient between the-organic and the aqueous phases up to 1.9, leading to an enhancement of the glucose conversion and HMF yield, attaining values of 98% and 63%, respectively, in a time as short as 30 min. The catalytic performance of this acid solid, associated to the presence of strong acid sites, is well maintained after three catalytic cycles. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available