4.5 Article

Resection of Tumors of the Neck of the Pancreas with Venous Invasion: the Whipple at the Splenic Artery (WATSA) Procedure

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 1048-1054

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1841-6

Keywords

Whipple procedure; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Mesenteric vein resection; Splenic vein

Funding

  1. Turpin Family HPB Surgery Division

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumors of the neck of the pancreas may involve the superior mesenteric and portal veins as well as the termination of the splenic vein. This presents a difficult problem since the pancreas cannot be transected through the neck as is standard in a Whipple procedure. Here, we present our method of resecting such tumors, which we term Whipple at the Splenic Artery (WATSA). The superior mesenteric and portal veins are isolated below and above the pancreas, respectively. The pancreas and splenic vein are divided just to the right of the point that the splenic artery contacts the superior border of the pancreas. This plane of transection is approximately 2 cm to the left of the pancreatic neck and away from the tumor. The superior mesenteric artery is cleared from the left side of the patient. With the specimen remaining attached only by the superior mesenteric and portal veins, these structures are clamped and divided. Reconstruction is performed with or without a superficial femoral vein graft. The splenic vein is not reconstructed. Ten cases have been performed to date without mortality. We have previously shown that the pattern of venous collateral development following occlusion of the termination of the splenic vein in the manner described is not similar to that of cases of sinistral (left sided) portal hypertension. Whipple at the splenic artery (WATSA) is a safe method for resection of tumors of the neck of the pancreas with vein involvement. It should be performed in high-volume pancreatic surgery centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available