4.5 Article

Enteral Nutrition Reduces Delayed Gastric Emptying After Standard Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Child Reconstruction

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 1004-1011

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1821-x

Keywords

Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Early enteral nutrition; Delayed gastric emptying; Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of enteral nutrition (EN) on DGE incidence after standard PD with antrectomy and Child reconstruction. We retrospectively analyzed 275 consecutive patients who underwent standard PD between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients operated on after January 2005 received EN (EN group, n = 152) until total oral alimentation. Patients operated on prior to 2005 did not receive EN (control group, n = 123) and were orally fed after removing the nasogastric tube. Primary endpoint was the incidence of DGE according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of any other complications. The incidence of DGE was 26% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) in the EN and control groups, respectively, with 17% vs. 19% for grade B DGE (NS) and 9% vs. 19% for grade C DGE (p = 0.02). The differences in DGE did not significantly decrease the duration of stay (18 +/- 11 vs. 19 +/- 13 days; NS). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was significantly reduced in the EN group (8% vs. 20%, p = 0.008), with the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula being similar in both groups (15% vs. 12%; NS). Using multivariate analysis, EN (p = 0.047, OR = 0.559 [0.315; 0.994]), operative time (p < 0.001, OR = 1.007 [1.003; 1.010]), and patient age (p = 0.014, OR = 1.031 [1.006; 1.057]) were independent factors affecting the incidence of DGE. EN reduces DGE and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available