4.8 Article

Promotion effect of ultraviolet light on NO plus CO reaction over Pt/TiO2 and Pt/CeO2-TiO2 catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 395-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.044

Keywords

Nitrogen monoxide reduction; Carbon monoxide oxidation; Platinum nanoparticles; Electron transfer; Photo-assisted effect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21073037, 2127037]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB239303]
  3. Science & Technology Plan Project of Fujian Province [2014Y2003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pt catalysts supported on TiO2 and CeO2-TiO2 (Pt/TiO2 and Pt/CeO2-TiO2) were prepared by a two-step precipitation-deposition method, respectively. As compared to Pt/TiO2, Pt/CeO2-TiO2 exhibits a higher thermo-catalytic activity and stability for CO + NO reaction, and also exhibits a stronger effect of ultraviolet light (UV) on promoting this reaction. The in-situ FTIR results indicate that the doped CeO2 can significantly improve the adsorption of NO at Pt/CeO2-TiO2, while UV light further enhance the adsorption of NO and its activation. Based on the results of Raman spectrum, electron paramagnetic resonance and the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy testing, it is proposed that UV irradiation can cause the increase in surface electron density of Pt nanoparticles by the photo-induced electron transfer from TiO2 to Pt. Moreover, the doped CeO2 can further improve the electron transfer from TiO2 to Pt through a process of Ce4+ -> Ce3+ under UV irradiation, resulting in the adsorption and activation of CO and NO species at Pt/CeO2-TiO2. This result also indicates that the photo-excitation of supports can strengthen the strong interaction between support and metal nanoparticles, and then promote the thermo-catalytic reactivity of catalysts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available