4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Dangerous liaisons: Pancreatic stellate cells and pancreatic cancer cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 69-74

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07000.x

Keywords

desmoplasia; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic stellate cells; tumor-stromal interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the characteristic features of the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas is an abundant desmoplastic/stromal reaction. Until recently, this stroma had received little attention from researchers studying the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer, with most of the research focus resting on the biology of tumor cells themselves. However, evidence is now accumulating that the stroma plays a critical role in pancreatic cancer progression. The cells responsible for producing the stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer are activated pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs, the key effector cells in pancreatic fibrogenesis). In vitro and in vivo studies have convincingly demonstrated a close bi-directional interaction between PSCs and pancreatic cancer cells, which facilitates local tumor growth as well as distant metastasis. PSCs also interact closely with endothelial cells to stimulate angiogenesis and are possibly involved in the known resistance of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy and radiation. Most interestingly, it has recently been shown that PSCs from the primary tumor can travel to distant metastatic sites where they likely facilitate the seeding, survival, and proliferation of cancer cells. Thus, it is now recognized that the stroma is an important alternative therapeutic target in this disease and concerted pre-clinical research is underway to develop strategies to modulate/deplete the stromal reaction to inhibit cancer progression. The challenge is to translate these developments into clinically applicable treatments for patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available