4.7 Article

Noise robustness and parallel computation of the inverse compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm in digital image correlation

Journal

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 9-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.03.005

Keywords

Noise robustness; Parallel computation; Inverse compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm; Digital image correlation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11272089, 11327201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inverse compositional Gauss-Newton (IC-GN) algorithm is one of the most popular sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation (DIC). The IC-GN algorithm, compared with the traditional forward additive Newton-Raphson (FA-NR) algorithm, can achieve the same accuracy in less time. However, there are no clear results regarding the noise robustness of IC-GN algorithm and the computational efficiency is still in need of further improvements. In this paper, a theoretical model of the IC-GN algorithm was derived based on the sum of squared differences correlation criterion and linear interpolation. The model indicates that the IC-GN algorithm has better noise robustness than the FA-NR algorithm, and shows no noise-induced bias if the gray gradient operator is chosen properly. Both numerical simulations and experiments show good agreements with the theoretical predictions. Furthermore, a seed point-based parallel method is proposed to improve the calculation speed. Compared with the recently proposed path-independent method, our model is feasible and practical, and it can maximize the computing speed using an improved initial guess. Moreover, we compared the computational efficiency of our method with that of the reliability-guided method using a four-point bending experiment, and the results show that the computational efficiency is greatly improved. This proposed parallel IC-GN algorithm has good noise robustness and is expected to be a practical option for real-time DIC. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available