4.7 Article

Risk factors for relapse of erosive GERD during long-term maintenance treatment with proton pump inhibitor: a prospective multicenter study in Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1193-1200

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0276-7

Keywords

Reflux esophagitis; Hiatus hernia; Helicobacter pylori; Los Angeles classification

Funding

  1. Eisai Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite low gastric acid secretion levels among elderly people and Helicobacter pylori-positive individuals in Japan, many patients suffer from endoscopic relapse of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) during standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy. We aimed to investigate the relapse rate and risk factors for relapse during long-term PPI therapy in a prospective multicenter study. Patients diagnosed endoscopically as having erosive GERD according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification, with remission under PPI medication, and without mucosal damage in the esophagus, were enrolled and took rabeprazole 10 mg/day, the standard dose in Japan, for up to 104 weeks, with endoscopy at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 104; erosive GERD with LA classification grade A, B, C, or D was defined as relapse. The baseline status of the 191 cases analyzed was: female (34.6%), a parts per thousand yen65 years old (50.8%), H. pylori-positive (40.8%), body mass index (BMI) a parts per thousand yen25 kg/m(2) (35.6%), and hiatus hernia (79.6%). Relapse occurred by week 104 in 21 cases (11%; 12 females, 9 males). Risk factors were hiatus hernia; severe past erosive GERD (grade C or D); H. pylori-negative; no mucosal atrophy; nonsmoking; and being female and < 150 cm in height. This study revealed the significant risk factors that might be monitored during long-term maintenance therapy to prevent relapse of GERD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available