Journal
JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 271-278Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2010.9665077
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We examined between-reader precision of age estimates of scales and pectoral fin rays for 123 highfin carpsuckers (Carpiodes velifer), 174 quillback carpsuckers (C. cyprinus), and 135 river carpsuckers (C. carpio). Precision of age estimates was assessed through measures of agreement, the coefficient of variation (CV), and a confidence rating. Exact agreement between readers was higher for tin rays (highfin carpsucker = 82.1%; quillback carpsucker = 75.9%; river carpsucker = 77.0%) than scales (highfin carpsucker = 69.5%, quillback carpsucker = 68.9%; river carpsucker = 71.1%). In addition, CV was lower for fin rays (highfin carpsucker = 2.28; quillback carpsucker = 2.43; river carpsucker = 2.90) than scales (highfin carpsucker = 2.95; quillback carpsucker = 3.00; river carpsucker = 3.46). Fin rays were also assigned a higher confidence rating (i.e., mean readability, 0-3 with 3 being high; highfin carpsucker = 2.22; quillback carpsucker = 1.95; river carpsucker = 1.92) than scales (highfin carpsucker = 1.53; quillback carpsucker = 1.51; river carpsucker = 1.68).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available