4.6 Article

Effects of Ho3+ and Yb3+ doping concentrations and Li+ co-doping on the luminescence of GdVO4 powders

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 76-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2015.03.013

Keywords

Ho3+-doped orthovanadate; Green downconversion; Red upconversion; Li+ co-doping

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia [45020, 172056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the structural and luminescent properties of Ho3+/Yb5+-doped GdVO4 and Li+-co-doped GdVO4:Ho3+/Yb3+ powder phosphors. The materials were prepared by high-temperature solid state method with different concentrations (between 0.5 and 2 mol%) of dopant Ho3+ emitting ions and different concentrations (between 5 and 20 mol%) of sensitizer Yb3+ ions. The dopant ions provided the material with intense luminescence emission; green emissions (centered at 542 nm from F-5(4),S-5(2) -> I-5(8) electronic transition of Ho3+ ions) resulted upon ultraviolet excitation, and red (centered at 659 nm from F-5(5) -> I-5(8) electronic transition of Ho3+ ions) upon near-infrared excitation. The co-doped materials were obtained under identical experimental conditions by adding Li+ ions (5, 7.5, 10, and 15 mol%). The powders co-doped with 7.5 mol% Li+ ions showed a downconversion emission intensity more than twice as high as the samples without if co-doping. In upconversion, an equal intensification of emission was achieved with co-doping with 10 mol% Li+. The influences of Ho3+/Yb3+ concentration ratio and Li+ co-doping level on emission color and emission branching was investigated and analyzed for both downconversion and upconversion emission. Increasing Yb3+ concentration was found to increase the share of dominant emission (green) in downconversion, but decreased the share of dominant emission (red) in upconversion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available