4.3 Article

Forensic Age Estimation on Digital X-ray Images: Medial Epiphyses of the Clavicle and First Rib Ossification in Relation to Chronological Age

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages S3-S12

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01626.x

Keywords

forensic science; forensic age estimation; first rib; ossification; clavicle; epiphyses; radiography

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Sciences of Spain under FEDER foundation [TIN2006-00829]
  2. Council of Innovation, Science and Companies of the Autonomic Government of Andalusia under FEDER foundation [TIC1619]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there has been a renewed interest in forensic sciences about forensic age estimation in living subjects by means of radiological methods. This research was conducted on digital thorax X-rays to test the usefulness of some radiological changes in the clavicle and first rib. The sample consisted in a total of 123 subjects of Spanish origin (61 men and 62 women; age range: 5-75 years). From all subjects, a thorax posterior-anterior radiograph was obtained in digital format. Scoring for fusion of medial epiphyses of the clavicle was carried out by Schmeling's system and ossification of the costal cartilage of the first rib by Michelson's system. Degree of ossification and epiphyseal fusion were analyzed in relation with known age and sex of these subjects. The results give a minimum age of > 20 years for full fusion of the medial epiphysis of the clavicle (Stages 4 and 5). Concerning the first rib, all subjects with the final Stage 3 of ossification were above 25 years of age. These results suggest that the first rib ossification might become an additional method to the ones so far recommended for forensic age estimation in subjects around 21. New research would be desirable to confirm this suggestion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available