4.5 Article

Physico-chemical properties of gelatin from bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) scales by ultrasound-assisted extraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 2166-2174

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-013-1239-9

Keywords

Bighead carp scales; Gelatin; Physicochemical properties

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA100803]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20123604110001]
  3. Jiangxi province science and technology support program [20122BBF60060]
  4. Project of Education Department of Jiangxi Province [GJJ12018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, gelatin was extracted from bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) scales by water bath (WB) and ultrasound bath (UB) at 60 degrees C for 1 h, 3 h and 5 h, named WB1, WB3, WB5, UB1, UB3 and UB5, respectively. The physicochemical properties of gelatin were investigated. The result indicated that gelatin extracted from bighead carp scales had a high protein content (84.15 similar to 91.85 %) with moisture (7.11 similar to 13.65 %), low ash content (0.31 similar to 0.97 %). All extracted gelatin contained alpha-and beta-chains as the predominant components. Gelatin extracted by UB obtained much higher yield (30.94-46.67 %) than that of WB (19.15-36.39 %). More voids and less sheets of gelatin structure were observed, when the gelatin was extracted by UB for longer time. Gelatin of UB-assisted extraction normally exhibited lower gel strength and melting points than that of WB, which may be resulted from the protein degradation reflected by the FTIR spectra and higher free amino group content. However, there was no significant difference between WB1 and UB1. Therefore, the ultrasound assisted extraction in a short time was a promising method to enhance the yield and obtain gelatin with high quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available