4.6 Article

Simultaneous Determination of 15 Phenolic Constituents of Chinese Black Rice Wine by HPLC-MS/MS with SPE

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages C1100-C1105

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12483

Keywords

anthocyanin; black rice wine; HPLC-MS; MS; phenolic constituents; solid-phase extraction

Funding

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology [2012BAH30F03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study established a new method for quantitative and qualitative determination of certain components in black rice wine, a traditional Chinese brewed wine. Specifically, we combined solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to determine 8 phenolic acids, 3 flavonols, and 4 anthocyanins in black rice wine. First, we clean samples with OASIS HLB cartridges and optimized extraction parameters. Next, we performed separation on a SHIM-PACK XR-ODS column (I.D. 3.0 mm x 75 mm, 2.2 m particle size) with a gradient elution of 50% aqueous acetonitrile (V/V) and water, both containing 0.2% formic acid. We used multiple-reaction monitoring scanning for quantification, with switching electrospray ion source polarity between positive and negative modes in a single chromatographic run. We detected 15 phenolic compounds properly within 38 min under optimized conditions. Limits of detection ranged from 0.008 to 0.030 mg/L, and average recoveries ranged from 60.8 to 103.1% with relative standard deviation 8.6%. We validated the method and found it to be sensitive and reliable for quantifying phenolic compounds in rice wine matrices. Practical Application This study developed a new, reliable HPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of 15 bioactive components in black rice wine. This method was validated and found to be sensitive and reliable for quantifying phenolic compounds in rice wine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available