4.6 Article

Chemical Composition and Anticancer and Antioxidant Activities of Schinus Molle L. and Schinus Terebinthifolius Raddi Berries Essential Oils

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages C466-C472

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01711.x

Keywords

anticancer; antioxidant; essential oils; GC-MS; Schimis molle; Schinus terebinthifolius

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Essential oils were obtained by steam distillation from berries of Schinus molle L. and Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi originating from southern of Tunisia and analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. Among 57 and 62 compounds (% [mg/100 g dry matter]) identified in these oils, the main were a-phellandrene (46.52% [1256.15] and 34.38% [859.60]), beta-phellandrene (20.81% [561.74] and 10.61% [265.15]), alpha-terpineol (8.38% [226.26] and 5.60% [140.03]), alpha-pinene (4.34% [117.29] and 6.49% [162.25]), beta-pinene (4.96% [133.81] and 3.09% [77.30]) and p-cymene (2.49% [67.28] and 7.34% [183.40]), respectively. A marked quantity of gamma-cadinene (18.04% [451.05]) was also identified in the S. terebinthifolius essential oil whereas only traces (0.07% [1.81]) were detected in the essential oil of S. molle. The in vitro antioxidant and antiradical scavenging properties of the investigated essential oils were evaluated by using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays. Essential oil of S. terebinthifolius expressed stronger antioxidant activity in the ABTS assay, with an IC50 of 24 +/- 0.8 mg/L, compared to S. molle (IC50 = 257 +/- 10.3 mg/L). Essential oils were also evaluated for their anticancer activities against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7). S. terebinthifolius essential oil was more effective against tested cell lines (IC50 = 47 +/- 9 mg/L) than that from S. molle (IC50 = 54 +/- 10 mg/L). Suggestions on relationships between chemical composition and biological activities are outlined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available