4.6 Article

Microscopic Quantification of Cell Integrity in Raw and Processed Onion Parenchyma Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 75, Issue 7, Pages E402-E408

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01764.x

Keywords

image analysis; microscopy; onions; parenchyma cells

Funding

  1. Organization of American States (OAS)
  2. Fulbright Commission
  3. Center for Advanced Processing and Packaging (CAPPS)
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0968960] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cell viability assessment method based computer vision analysis of the uptake of neutral red dye was used to quantify cell membrane integrity in raw and processed parenchyma cells of onion tissues. The presence of stained vacuoles was used as an indicator of tonoplast membrane integrity and photomicrographs were acquired for microscopic image analysis and cell integrity quantification. Two different image analysis methods, involving the analysis of the saturation and green components of RGB (red, green, blue) images, were compared to the conventional cell count method. Use of the saturation component of RGB images allowed for the visualization and quantification of viable and inviable cells as well as extracellular air spaces. The combination of neutral red uptake, as visualization by light field microscopy, and saturation image analysis, allowed for quantitative determination of the effects of high pressure processing on onion cell integrity. Practical Application Preservation of vegetable tissues may involve heating or other methods that result in the loss of tissue integrity and potentially quality deterioration. In this study, we stained unprocessed and processed onion tissues with neutral red dye and then used a microscope and a computer imaging program to quantify how many cells were intact or ruptured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available