4.4 Article

Validation of Ground-and-Formed Beef Jerky Processes Using Commercial Lactic Acid Bacteria Starter Cultures as Pathogen Surrogates

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1234-1247

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.6.1234

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Seth Pulsfus and Bryan Lemmenes (ARPRTC)
  2. USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, National Integrated Food Safety Initiative [2006-51110-03640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beef jerky has been linked to multiple outbreaks of salmonellosis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection over the past 40 years. With increasing government scrutiny of jerky-making process lethality, a simple method by which processors can easily validate the lethality of their ground-and-formed beef jerky process against Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 is greatly needed. Previous research with whole-muscle beef jerky indicated that commercial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) may be more heat resistant than Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7, suggesting the potential use of LAB as pathogen surrogates. Of six commercial LAB-containing cultures evaluated for heat resistance in ground-and-formed beef jerky, Saga 200 (Pediococcus spp.) and Biosource (Pediococcus acidilactici) were identified as consistently more heat resistant than Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7. Six representative ground-and-formed beef jerky commercial processes, differing widely in lethality, were used to identify an appropriate level of LAB reduction that would consistently indicate a process sufficiently lethal (>= 5.0-log reduction) for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7. Both Saga 200 and Biosource consistently predicted adequate process lethality with a criterion of >= 5.0-log reduction of LAB. When either LAB decreased by >= 5.0 log CFU, processes were sufficiently lethal against Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in 100% of samples (it = 39 and 40, respectively). Use of LAB as pathogen surrogates for ground-and-formed beef jerky process validation was field tested by three small meat processors, who found this technique easy to use for process validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available