4.4 Article

Analysis of Additional Virulence Genes and Virulence Gene Regions in Listeria monocytogenes Confirms the Epidemiologic Relevance of Multi-Virulence-Locus Sequence Typing

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 71, Issue 12, Pages 2559-2566

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2559

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous molecular subtyping studies have defined four epidemic clones (ECs) of Listeria in monocytogenes (ECL, ECII, ECIII, and ECIV). Partial sequences of eight virulence genes were previously shown to be identical within individual ECs of L. monocytogenes. The present study was conducted to determine if the sequences of other virulence genes and virulence gene regions are also conserved within these ECs. Six additional virulence genes-bsh, hly, inlJ, lplAI, pgdA, and srtA-and three additional virulence gene regions of actA, inlA, and inlB were selected based on their role in L. monocytogenes virulence, and intragenic re-ions of each gene were sequenced. Sequencing was performed on a diverse set of 44 to 48 L. monocytogenes strains. Results demonstrated that the sequenced regions of the nine virulence genes were identical within cacti of the ECs, and 257 new single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) were identified. ECIII (lineage II) was easily distinguishable front the other ECs, as 238 SNPs were observed in ECIII due to its sionificant evolutionary divergence front lineage 1. With regard to the other ECs, there were 5 SNPs that represented an informative set. since these SNPs were able to differentiate specific ECs front all other unrelated strains used in this Study. This Study confirms our previous finding that virulence gene sequences are highly conserved within individual ECs and contain stable SNPs that can be used to very accurately differentiate ECs of L monocytogenes from each other and front other diverse strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available