4.4 Article

Quality of Tuna Fish Oils Extracted from Processing the By-Products of Three Species of Neritic Tuna Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 432-441

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12248

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia [1001/PTKIND/845032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fatty acid constituents of total lipids extracted from the head, the skin and the viscera of three neritic tuna species, namely Thunnus tonggol, Euthynnus affinis and Auxis thazard, using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and Soxhlet extraction method were determined and compared. Saturated fatty acid (39.7-48.5%) was dominant in conjunction with monounsaturated fatty acid (21.9-26.6%) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) (24.1-27.9%) in all species, and the difference between methods were nonsignificant. Docosahexaenoic acid was the major PUFA, accounting for 17.0-19.9% in the head, 15.7-17.3% in the skin and 14.3-16.1% in the viscera of total fatty acids. Total oil extracted by SC-CO2 had lower free fatty acid (FFA) and peroxide value (PV) content than that by Soxhlet method. The ranges of FFA and PV were 1.8-5.0 and 1.2-2.4%, respectively. It was concluded that SC-CO2 is an effective method to extract fish oil that is rich in omega-3 fatty acids from tuna by-products. Practical ApplicationsFish waste is a by-product of fish process and fish-based food industries. Fish oil could be extracted from tuna fish waste that contains high amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Supercritical fluid extraction could be applied to obtain refined, bleached and deodorized fish oil from tuna waste without any toxic organic solvent. Tuna waste oil contains long chain of omega-3,6 fatty acids, especially DHA, which have potential health benefits in reducing the risk of various diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available