4.6 Article

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion The 24-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 538-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
  2. Genentech
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  4. Aerpio
  5. Allergan
  6. Genzyme
  7. Oxford BioMedica
  8. Roche
  9. Equity - Graybug
  10. Acucela
  11. Alcon
  12. Alimera
  13. Kato
  14. Lpath
  15. Notal Vision
  16. Novartis
  17. Ohr Pharmaceutical
  18. Ophthotech
  19. QLT
  20. Abbott
  21. GSK
  22. Pfizer
  23. pSivida
  24. Quark
  25. Santen
  26. ThromboGenics
  27. XOMA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Design: The VIBRANT study was a double-masked, active-controlled, randomized, phase III trial. Participants: Treatment-naive eyes with macular edema after BRVO were included in the study if the occlusion occurred within 12 months and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was between <= 73 and >= 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent). Methods: Eyes (1 eye per patient) received either IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (n - 91) from baseline to week 20 or grid laser (n = 92) at baseline with a single grid laser rescue treatment, if needed, from weeks 12 through 20. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes that gained >= 15 ETDRS letters from baseline BCVA at week 24. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) at week 24. Results: The proportion of eyes that gained >= 15 ETDRS letters from baseline at week 24 was 52.7% in the IAI group compared with 26.7% in the laser group (P = 0.0003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA at week 24 was 17.0 ETDRS letters in the IAI group and 6.9 ETDRS letters in the laser group (P<0.0001). The mean reduction in CRT from baseline at week 24 was 280.5 mu m in the IAI group and 128.0 mu m in the laser group (P<0.0001). Traumatic cataract in an IAI patient was the only ocular serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred. There were no cases of intraocular inflammation or endophthalmitis. The incidence of nonocular SAEs was 8.8% in the IAI group and 9.8% in the laser group. One Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboratione-defined event of nonfatal stroke (1.1%) and 1 death (1.1%) due to pneumonia occurred during the 24 weeks of the study, both in patients in the laser group. Conclusions: Monthly IAI provided significantly greater visual benefit and reduction in CRT at 24 weeks than grid laser photocoagulation in eyes with macular edema after BRVO. (C) 2015 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available