4.7 Article

Water phase transition under pressure and its application in high pressure thawing of agar gel and fish

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.016

Keywords

High pressure; Phase transition; Thawing; Calorimeter; Fish

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31071620]
  2. 863 Plan of National High-Tech Research and Development [2011AA100801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments were carried out with a high-pressure (HP) differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and a HP unit using frozen agar gel (3%, w/w) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Small samples (0.54-0.7 g) were prepared for HP DSC tests. Frozen samples of agar gel and salmon muscle in cylinders (47.5 mm diameter, 135 mm length) were subjected to water immersion thawing (WIT) (20 degrees C) and HP thawing at 100, 150 and 200 MPa with a water temperature of 20 degrees C. Phase transition temperature of agar gel was close to the phase diagram of pure water. Melting temperature of salmon was significantly lower than phase diagram of pure water probably due to the presence of solutes and cellular structures in fish. HP DSC tests demonstrated a good correlation between temperature (T) and average pressure (P): T = -1.22-0.0946P - 0.000115P(2) (R-2 = 0.99, n = 10). High pressure caused a depression of the ice-melting temperature resulting in an accelerated thawing process. The reduction of melting plateau time can be predicated by using Plank's model. For frozen agar gel, the total thawing time was 50.3 +/- 2.7, 36.4 +/- 2.2 and 30.8 +/- 1.8 min, or 73, 53 and 45% of WIT time (68.7 +/- 4.3 min) at 100, 150 and 200 MPa, respectively. For frozen fish, the total thawing time was 58.9 +/- 2.8, 41.8 +/- 4.7, 37.2 +/- 2.6 and 33.8 +/- 1.9 min for WIT, HPT at above pressures, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available