4.7 Article

Classification, modeling and prediction of the mechanical behavior of starch-based films

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 188-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.05.028

Keywords

Artificial neural network; Clustering; Mechanical properties; Self-organizing maps; Starch-based film

Funding

  1. CONICYT/CNRS [512, 25305]
  2. Fondecyt [1120661]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The starch-based film properties database was created with 8 variables and 322 observations collected from the literature. The selected variables were: (1) the starch origin (potato, cassava (tapioca), corn (maize), wheat, yam), (2) the starch concentration, (3) the amylose content, (4) the glycerol concentration, (5) the ambient relative humidity during storage, (6) the aging time of films and two mechanical properties of the starch films at break, (7) tensile strength at break (s(b)) and (8) strain at break (e(b)). The main objective of this work was to classify the data set and to predict mechanical properties (tensile strength (s(b)) and strain at break (e(b)) of starch-based films using a Rival Penalized Competitive Algorithm to find the clusters and, for each class, an artificial neural network (ANN) model from 6 parameters (starch origin, starch concentration (%), amylose content (%), glycerol content, ambient relative humidity (RH) and the aging of films). Each ANN was optimized using a genetic algorithm. The root-mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination B allowed to choose the best ANN. The results showed that it was possible to distinguish five classes where the composition of each class C-i could be described accurately and connected with the mechanical behavior of the films. This work also showed that it was useful firstly to classify the database before attempting to predict the mechanical properties of the starch-based films. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available