4.7 Article

Droplet breakup and coalescence in a twin-screw extrusion processing of starch based matrix

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 118-129

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.12.010

Keywords

Food extrusion; Twin screw extruder; Dispersive mixing; Plasticized starch; Droplet breakup; Coalescence; CFD; Simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formation of oil droplets during twin screw extrusion processing of maize starch was investigated by analyzing the droplet breakup and coalescence mechanisms separately. For this purpose, the flow was characterized by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) using material data derived from online rheological measurements. The simulated results on local flow conditions were coupled to experimental data on the dispersed phase morphology, which was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). This was used to elucidate the influence of process characteristics relevant for droplet breakup and coalescence. The results showed that increasing screw speed does not necessarily result in smaller droplet sizes. This could be related to the contradictory effects: increasing screw speed improves droplet breakup but also increases the rate of coalescence. Smaller droplet sizes were obtained at higher blend viscosities, which could be achieved either by increasing the feed rate or by using screw configuration that applies less mechanical stress. The results suggest that an increase in blend viscosity reduced the rate of coalescence. Moreover, increasing oil content led to an increased rate of coalescence, and therefore to remarkably bigger droplets. Selection of process parameters (e.g. screw configuration, feed rate, screw speed) based on the findings of this study allowed enhancing the dispersive mixing efficiency of triglyceride droplets during extrusion processing of maize starch. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available