4.6 Article

Biochemical markers defining growing area and ripening stage of imported avocado fruit cv. Hass

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 90-98

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.11.011

Keywords

Avocado; Persea americana Mill.; Hass cultivar; Oleic acid; Fruit ripening; D-Mannoheptulose; Sugars; Fatty acids; Origin; Season; Storage conditions and nutrient stability; Pre- and post-harvest factors and nutrition; Bioactive non-nutrients; Food analysis; Food composition

Funding

  1. Mack Multiplies and Cranfield University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intra-varietal differences in avocado fruit composition were investigated with regard to fruit growing area, maturity, ripening stage and storage conditioning. In particular, mesocarp nutrients such as fatty acids and C7 sugars were investigated as they relate to fruit origin and ripening stage, respectively. The effect of storage temperature on nutrient level was also assessed. Fruit from Chile, Peru and Spain and harvested in the respective early, middle and late season were ripened for seven days at 18 or 23 degrees C. At specific intervals, mesocarp fatty acids and sugar profiles were identified. The oil composition differed according to origin and harvest-time, suggesting oleic acid as a potential marker in distinguishing fruit origin. Chilean fruit had higher oleic content (57-61%) follow by Spanish (54-60%) and Peruvian (40-47%) fruit. In early season fruit D-mannoheptulose content decreased during shelf life from 128 to 23.5 mg g(-1) (Chile), from 115 to 33.6 mg g(-1) (Peru), from 65.2 to 23.5 mg g(-1) (Spain). A similar trend was noted in middle and late season fruit and from the three origins. For the first time a relationship between C7 sugar content and mesocarp softening, fruit maturity and origin was identified. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available