4.6 Article

Antioxidant activity, quality parameters and mineral content of Portuguese monofloral honeys

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 130-138

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2013.02.009

Keywords

Food analysis; Food composition; Arbutus unedo; Ceratonia siliqua L.; Thymus spp.; Monofloral honey; Quality parameters; Main mineral content; Antioxidant activity; Adulteration; Food safety

Funding

  1. Federacao Nacional dos Apicultores de Portugual (FNAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physicochemical properties (pH, free, lactonic and total acidity, electrical conductivity and moisture), main mineral content (potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium and iron) and antioxidant activity (total phenolics, 1,1diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging and ferric reduction antioxidant power) were determined for 39 Portuguese monofloral honeys (rosemary, orange, thyme, arbutus, locust podshrub and heather) with different geographical origins. Portuguese honeys showed good chemical and nutritional qualities fulfilling the criteria described in Directive 2001/110/CE. Potassium was the main mineral component representing 85% of total minerals. The mineral composition of sodium (4.63-200.60 mg/kg), calcium (0.43-72.30 mg/kg), magnesium (3.05-82.20 mg/kg) and iron (below 7.06 mg/kg) were higher for heather, eucalypt and arbutus honeys. Monofloral honeys of arbutus (Arbutus unedo), locust podshrub (Ceratonia siliqua L) and heather (Erica umbellata) showed higher antioxidant activity with phenolic contents higher than 600 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/kg, a DPPH scavenging activity higher than 50% and a ferric reduction antioxidant power above 600 mu M Fe2+. Furthermore, the chemometric analysis revealed that total phenolic content was a crucial variable explaining the antioxidant activity of arbutus and locust podshrub honeys characteristic of the south of Portugal. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available