4.6 Article

Simultaneous analysis of 21 elements in foodstuffs by ICP-MS after closed-vessel microwave digestion: Method validation

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 111-120

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.04.002

Keywords

Validation process; Essential and non-essential trace elements; ICP-MS; Microwave digestion; Quality controls; Foodstuffs; French Total Diet Study; Dietary exposure; Toxic food contamination levels in a population; Food analysis; Food and nutrition data; Food composition; Toxicological reference value

Funding

  1. general food directorate of the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
  2. general health directorate of the Ministry of Health and Sports

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a validation process for the simultaneous analysis of 21 elements: lithium (Li), aluminium (Al), vanadium (V), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), gallium (Ga), germanium (Ge), arsenic (As), strontium (Sr), molybdenum (Mo), silver (Ag), cadmium (Cd), tin (Sn), antimony (Sb), tellurium (Te), barium (Ba), mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb) in food samples by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after closed-vessel microwave digestion. This validation was realized in parallel with the analysis of the 1322 food samples of the second French Total Diet Study (TDS) by the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) of the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA). Several criteria such as linearity, limits of quantification (LOQ), specificity, precision under repeatability conditions and intermediate precision reproducibility were evaluated. Furthermore, the method was supervised by several internal and external quality controls (IQC and EQC). Results indicate that this method could be used in the laboratory for the routine determination of these 21 essential and nonessential elements in foodstuffs with acceptable analytical performance. (c) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available