4.6 Article

Quantitation of N-acetylneuraminic (sialic) acid in bovine glycomacropeptide (GMP)

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 359-366

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2009.12.004

Keywords

Glycomacropeptide; Caseinomacropeptide; GMP; CMP; N-Acetylneuraminic; Sialic; 1,2-diamine-4,5-dimethoxybenzene; DDB; Thiobarbituric acid; TBA; Validated method for determination; Food analysis; Food composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bovine glycomacropeptide (GMP) is the hydrophilic C-terminal peptide produced from kappa-casein during cheese-making. N-Acetylneuraminic acid (NeuNAc) is one of the sugars associated with bovine GMP and the reported biological and functional properties of this dairy peptide. A sensitive RP-H PLC method has been developed to quantify NeuNAc in GMP using the fluorophore 1,2-diamine-4,5-dimethoxyl benzene dihydrochloride (DDB). The NeuNAc liberation conditions, DDB derivatisation conditions, labelling mixture and internal standard (alpha-keto glutaric acid) were optimised and the amount of NeuNAc in three different GMP samples determined. The optimal conditions required to liberate NeuNAc from bovine GMP were 25 mM sulphuric acid at 80 degrees C for 120 min. The optimal DDB derivatisation conditions were 60 degrees C for 150 min. Masses of the DDB derivatised NeuNAc (442 m/z) and alpha-KG (278 m/z) peaks were confirmed using LC-MS (ESI). The NeuNAc content of GMP samples ranged from 5.0% to 11.3% (w/w). Results were compared to the spectrophotometric thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method. TBA results for the same samples ranged from 6.4% to 13.5% (w/w). The DDB method developed had a limit of detection (LOD) of 7 pg and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 20 pg. This sensitive method can be employed to accurately quantify the NeuNAc content of GMP. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available