4.6 Article

Assessment of the contents of phytic acid and divalent cations in low phytic acid (lpa) mutants of rice and soybean

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 278-284

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.11.022

Keywords

Low phytic acid; Rice; Oryza sativa L; Soybean; Glycine max L. Merr.; Divalent cations; Calcium; Iron; Zinc; Cadmium; Molar ratios; Anti-nutrient; Food safety; Food composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of mutational breeding on the contents of nutritionally relevant minerals in low phytic acid (Ipa) mutants compared to their wild-types. Three Ipa rice (Os-lpa-XQZ-1, Os-lpa-XS110-1, Os-lpa-XS110-2) and two lpa soybean mutants (Gm-lpa-TW75-1, Gm-lpa-ZC-2) were analyzed regarding their contents of phytic acid. lower inositol phosphates and the minerals calcium, iron and zinc. Additionally, cadmium was included into the spectrum of divalent cations analyzed. The phytic acid reduction in Ipa rice was consistently more pronounced in os-lpa-XS110-1 than in Os-lpa-XQZ-1 and Os-lpa-XS110-2. However, only for Os-lpa-XQZ-1, levels of calcium, iron and zinc were found to be consistently increased, whereas the cadmium level was shown to be predominantly decreased compared to the wild-type. Investigation of the two lpa soybean mutants, characterized by absence (Gm-lpa-TW75-1) and accumulation (Gm-lpa-ZC-2) of lower inositol phosphates, respectively, revealed no consistently decreased or increased contents of calcium, iron, zinc and cadmium. The data do not change the view that Ipa mutations do not result in systematic increases or decreases of mineral contents in these crops. However, on the basis of the molar ratios of phyrtate/minerals in lpa rice and soybean mutants which are considered as predictive parameters, an improved bioavailability of minerals in the lpa materials can be expected. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available