4.4 Article

Study on the Binding Behavior of Lysozyme with Cephalosporin Analogues by Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUORESCENCE
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 801-808

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10895-009-0477-8

Keywords

Lysozyme; Cefradine; Cefuroxime; Cefotaxime; Ceftriaxone; Hydrophobic effect

Funding

  1. Shaanxi Province Nature Science Foundation
  2. Foundation of Ministry of Education
  3. NWU Graduate Innovation and Creativity Funds, China [2006B05, 07JK395, 08YZZ42]
  4. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was first found that the intrinsic fluorescence of lysozyme at 340 nm can be quenched by cephalosporin analogues through the static quenching and non-radiative energy transferring procedure. In the acetate buffer solution with pH 7.0 and 298 K, the quenching fluorescence intensity was in a good linearity over the concentration of drugs in the range of 1-100 mu mol L-1, 0.1-100 mu mol L-1, 0.5-100 mu mol L-1 and 0.05-100 mu mol L-1 for cefradine, cefuroxime, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, respectively. The quenching ability or the binding ability of the studied drugs followed the pattern: ceftriaxone > cefotaxime > cefuroxime > cefradine, which was close to the order of their antibacterial ability. The binding parameters including the association constant and the number of binding potential point were calculated at different temperatures (288, 298 and 308 K), and thermodynamic parameters Delta HA degrees, Delta SA degrees and Delta GA degrees were given. The binding mode of lysozyme with cephalosporins showed that the hydrophobic effect might play a major role. The binding distance between cephalosporin and tryptophan residue in lysozyme was obtained. The results provided the quantitative information for the binding of cephalosporin to lysozyme, and it was suggested that the drugs probably bound to the active site near Trp62 in lysozyme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available