4.7 Article

On the need for a nonlinear subscale turbulence term in POD models as exemplified for a high-Reynolds-number flow over an Ahmed body

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 747, Issue -, Pages 518-544

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.168

Keywords

low-dimensional models; turbulence simulation; wakes

Funding

  1. Trafikverket (Swedish Transport Administration)
  2. PSA Peugeot Citroen
  3. ANRT
  4. Chalmers Sustainable Transport Initiative
  5. Institute PPRIME
  6. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate a hierarchy of eddy- viscosity terms in proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) Galerkin models to account for a large fraction of unresolved fluctuation energy. These Galerkin methods are applied to large eddy simulation (LES) data for a flow around a vehicle-like bluff body called an Ahmed body. This flow has three challenges for any reduced-order model: a high Reynolds number, coherent structures with broadband frequency dynamics, and meta-stable asymmetric base flow states. The Galerkin models are found to be most accurate with modal eddy viscosities as proposed by Rempfer & Fasel (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 260, 1994a, pp. 351-375; J. Fluid Mech. vol. 275, 1994b, pp. 257-283). Robustness of the model solution with respect to initial conditions, eddy-viscosity values and model order is achieved only for state-dependent eddy viscosities as proposed by Noack, Morzy n nski & Tadmor (Reduced-Order Modelling for Flow Control, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 528, 2011). Only the POD system with state-dependent modal eddy viscosities can address all challenges of the flow characteristics. All parameters are analytically derived from the Navier- Stokes-based balance equations with the available data. We arrive at simple general guidelines for robust and accurate POD models which can be expected to hold for a large class of turbulent flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available