4.7 Article

Forced spreading of films and droplets of colloidal suspensions

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 742, Issue -, Pages 495-519

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.27

Keywords

coating; colloids; thin films

Funding

  1. Industrial Partnership for Research in Interfacial and Materials Engineering at the University of Minnesota
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER46415]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-07ER46415] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When a thin film of a colloidal suspension flows over a substrate, uneven distribution of the suspended particles can lead to an uneven coating. Motivated by this phenomenon, we analyse the flow of perfectly wetting films and droplets of colloidal suspensions down an inclined plane. Lubrication theory and the rapid-vertical-diffusion approximation are used to derive a coupled pair of one-dimensional partial differential equations describing the evolution of the interface height and particle concentration. Precursor films are assumed to be present, the colloidal particles are taken to be hard spheres, and particle and liquid dynamics are coupled through a concentration-dependent viscosity and diffusivity. We find that for sufficiently high Peclet numbers, even small initial concentration inhomogeneities produce viscosity gradients that cause the film or droplet front to evolve continuously in time instead of travelling without changing shape as happens in the absence of colloidal particles. At high enough particle concentrations, particle diffusion can lead to the formation of long-lived secondary flow fronts in films. Our results suggest that particle concentration gradients can have a dramatic influence on interface evolution in flowing films and droplets, a finding which may be relevant for understanding the onset of patterns that are observed experimentally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available