4.7 Article

Sharp transition between coalescence and non-coalescence of sessile drops

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 743, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.73

Keywords

breakup/coalescence; convection; drops and bubbles; interfacial flows (free surface); marangoni convection; thin films

Funding

  1. DFG [RI529/16-1]
  2. LAM Research AG, Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unexpectedly, under certain conditions, sessile drops from different but completely miscible liquids do not always coalesce instantaneously upon contact: the drop bodies remain separated in a temporary state of non-coalescence, connected through a thin liquid bridge. Here we investigate the transition between the states of instantaneous coalescence and temporary non-coalescence. Experiments reveal that it is barely influenced by viscosities and absolute surface tensions. The main system control parameters for the transition are the arithmetic means of the three-phase angles, (Theta) over bar (a), and the surface tension differences Delta gamma between the two liquids. These relevant parameters can be combined into a single system parameter, a specific Marangoni number (M) over tilde = 3 Delta gamma/(2 (gamma) over bar(Theta) over bar (2)(a)). This (M) over tilde universally characterizes the coalescence transition behaviour as a function of both the physicochemical liquid properties and the shape of the liquid body in the contact region. The transition occurs at a certain threshold value (M) over tilde (t) and is sharp within the experimental resolution. The experimentally observed threshold value of (M) over tilde (t) approximate to 2 agrees quantitatively with values obtained by simulations assuming realistic material parameters. The simulations indicate that the absolute value of (M) over tilde (t) very weakly depends on the molecular diffusivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available