4.7 Article

Sheet-like and plume-like thermal flow in a spherical convection experiment performed under microgravity

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 735, Issue -, Pages 647-683

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.507

Keywords

Benard convection; geophysical and geological flows; nonlinear dynamical systems

Funding

  1. ESA [AO-99-049]
  2. German Aerospace Center DLR [50 WM 0122, 50 WM 0822]
  3. 'GeoFlow' Topical Team [18950/05/NL/VJ]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce, in spherical geometry, experiments on electro-hydrodynamic driven Rayleigh-Benard convection that have been performed for both temperature-independent ('GeoFlow I') and temperature-dependent fluid viscosity properties ('GeoFlow II') with a measured viscosity contrast up to 1.5. To set up a self-gravitating force field, we use a high-voltage potential between the inner and outer boundaries and a dielectric insulating liquid; the experiments were performed under microgravity conditions on the International Space Station. We further run numerical simulations in three-dimensional spherical geometry to reproduce the results obtained in the 'GeoFlow' experiments. We use Wollaston prism shearing interferometry for flow visualization - an optical method producing fringe pattern images. The flow patterns differ between our two experiments. In GeoFlow I', we see a sheet-like thermal flow. In this case convection patterns have been successfully reproduced by three-dimensional numerical simulations using two different and independently developed codes. In contrast, in 'GeoFlow II', we obtain plume-like structures. Interestingly, numerical simulations do not yield this type of solution for the low viscosity contrast realized in the experiment. However, using a viscosity contrast of two orders of magnitude or higher, we can reproduce the patterns obtained in the ` GeoFlow II' experiment, from which we conclude that nonlinear effects shift the effective viscosity ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available