4.7 Article

Lock-exchange gravity currents with a high volume of release propagating over a periodic array of obstacles

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 672, Issue -, Pages 570-605

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112010006312

Keywords

gravity currents; separated flows; turbulent mixing

Funding

  1. NSF [CBET-0854338]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [0854338] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0854338] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large eddy simulations are employed to investigate the structure and evolution of a bottom-propagating compositional gravity current in a rectangular horizontal plane channel containing a series of identical large-scale obstacles (dunes and square ribs) at the channel bottom. Simulation results show that below a certain value of the additional drag force per unit streamwise length induced by the bottom obstacles (low drag cases), the gravity current propagating over an array of obstacles transitions to a regime where the average front velocity is close to constant. Past its initial stages, the total kinetic energy, E-k, increases in time proportional to t(1/3), where t is the time since release. This behaviour is similar to the slumping phase observed for currents propagating over a flat bed, with the exception that in the latter case the temporal increase of E-k during the later stages of the slumping phase is much faster (E-k similar to t). Simulation results also show that above certain value of the drag force per unit streamwise length induced by the obstacles (high drag cases), the slumping phase can be very short. In this case, similar to currents propagating in a porous medium, the current transitions to a drag-dominated regime in which the front velocity decays proportionally to t(beta), with beta = -0.28, once the discharge

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available