4.7 Article

The wake of two side-by-side square cylinders

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 669, Issue -, Pages 432-471

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112010005288

Keywords

flow-structure interactions; separated flows; vortex streets

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the HKSAR [PolyU 5334/06E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerodynamic interference between two cylinders involves most of the generic flow features associated with multiple structures, thus providing an excellent model for gaining physical insight into the wake of multiple cylindrical structures. This work aims to provide an experimental systematic study of the flow behind two side-by-side square cylinders. The square cylinder is a representative model for bluff bodies with sharp corners, characterized by a fixed flow separation point, which are distinct from those of continuous curvature with oscillating separation points, typically represented by the circular cylinder. Experiments were performed at a Reynolds number Re of 4.7x10(4) and a cylinder centre-to-centre spacing ratio T/d (d is the cylinder height) of 1.02-6.00. The flow was measured using different techniques, including hot wires, load cell, particle imaging velocimetry and laser-induced fluorescence flow visualization. Four distinct flow regimes and their corresponding T/d ranges are identified for the first time on the basis of the flow structure and the Strouhal number. Physical aspects in each regime, such as interference between shear layers, gap flow deflection and changeover, multiple flow modes, entrainment, recirculation bubble, vortex interactions and formation lengths, are investigated in detail and are connected to the characteristics of the time-averaged and fluctuating fluid forces. The flow displays a marked difference in many facets from that behind two side-by-side circular cylinders, which is linked to their distinct flow separation natures. A crucial role played by the gap flow and its passage geometry in contributing to the observed difference is also unveiled.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available