4.7 Article

Three-dimensional vortex organization in a high-Reynolds-number supersonic turbulent boundary layer

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 644, Issue -, Pages 35-60

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112009992047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW [DLR.61.98]
  2. Ira A. Fulton endowment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tomographic particle image velocimetry was used to quantitatively visualize the three-dimensional coherent structures in a supersonic (Mach 2) turbulent boundary layer in the region between gamma/delta = 0.15 and 0.89. The Reynolds number based on momentum thickness Re-theta = 34 000. The instantaneous velocity fields give evidence of hairpin vortices aligned in the streamwise direction forming very long zones of low-speed fluid, consistent with Tomkins & Adrian (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 490, 2003, p. 37). The observed hairpin structure is also a statistically relevant structure as is shown by the conditional average flow field associated to spanwise swirling motion. Spatial low-pass filtering of the velocity field reveals streamwise vortices and signatures of large-scale hairpins (height > 0.5 delta), which are weaker than the smaller scale hairpins in the unfiltered velocity field. The large-scale hairpin structures in the instantaneous velocity fields are observed to be aligned in the streamwise direction and spanwise organized along diagonal lines. Additionally the autocorrelation function of the wall-normal swirling motion representing the large-scale hairpin structure returns positive correlation peaks in the streamwise direction (at 1.5 delta distance from the DC peak) and along the 45 degrees diagonals, which also suggest a periodic arrangement in those directions. This is evidence for the existence of a spanwise-stream wise organization of the coherent structures in a fully turbulent boundary layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available