4.7 Article

Motion of a drop along the centreline of a capillary in a pressure-driven flow

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 640, Issue -, Pages 27-54

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112009991212

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. E.U. Marie Curie fellowship [IEF-041766]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deformation of a drop as it flows along the axis of a circular capillary in low Reynolds number pressure-driven flow is investigated numerically by means of boundary integral computations. If gravity effects are negligible, the drop motion is determined by three independent parameters: the size a of the undeformed drop relative to the radius R of the capillary, the viscosity ratio lambda between the drop phase and the wetting phase and the capillary number Ca, which measures the relative importance of viscous and capillary forces. We investigate the drop behaviour in the parameter space (a/R, lambda, Ca), at capillary numbers higher than those considered previously. If the fluid flow rate is maintained, the presence of the drop causes a change in the pressure difference between the ends of the capillary, and this too is investigated. Estimates for the drop deformation at high capillary number are based on a simple model for annular flow and, in most cases, agree well with full numerical results if lambda >= 1/2, in which case the drop elongation increases without limit as Ca increases. If lambda < 1/2, the drop elongates towards a limiting non-zero cylindrical radius. Low-viscosity drops (lambda < 1) break up owing to a re-entrant jet at the rear, whereas a travelling capillary wave instability eventually develops on more viscous drops (lambda > 1). A companion paper (Lac & Sherwood, J. Fluid Mech., doi:10.1017/S002211200999156X) uses these results in order to predict the change in electrical streaming potential caused by the presence of the drop when the capillary wall is charged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available