4.5 Article

Detection of antigenic proteins expressed by lymphocystis virus as vaccine candidates in olive flounder, Paratichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel)

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 555-562

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01268.x

Keywords

immunoproteomics; ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF); lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV); matrix assisted laser desorption nanoelectrospray MS/MS; olive flounder

Funding

  1. World Class University [R32-10253]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2008-0061829]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0061829] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the major capsid proteins (MCPs) of lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV) have been characterized, little is known about the host-derived immune response to MCPs and other LCDV antigenic proteins. To identify antigenic proteins of LCDV that could be used as vaccine candidates in olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, we analysed the viral proteins responsible for its virulence by applying immuno-proteomics. LCDV proteins were separated by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and probed with homogeneous P. olivaceus antisera elicited by LCDV natural infection and vaccination with formalin-killed LCDV. Four immune-reactive proteins were obtained at 68-, 51-, 41- and 21 kDa using antisera collected from natural infection while two proteins at 51- and 21 kDa exhibited response to antisera from vaccinated fish, indicating that the latter two proteins have vaccine potential. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and nanoelectrospray MS/MS, the 51 and 21 kDa proteins were identified as MCP and an unknown protein, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available