4.4 Article

Influence of freshwater flows on the distribution of eggs and larvae of black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri within a drought-affected estuary

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages 2281-2301

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03283.x

Keywords

climate change; fisheries; halocline; salinity; salt wedge; stratification

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0668997]
  2. Fisheries Victoria
  3. Department of Sustainability and Environment
  4. Gippsland Coastal Board
  5. Australian Research Council [LP0668997] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested the hypothesis that variable freshwater flow in the Gippsland Lakes, Australia, influences the location and extent of environmental conditions suitable for spawning and larval development of black bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri. Freshwater flow had a large influence on the salinity and level of stratification (difference between bottom and surface salinity) in the Gippsland Lakes. Freshwater flows throughout this study varied from no or low flows through to major flooding in 2007. Eggs of A. butcheri were found in similar concentrations throughout the lakes and rivers. More than 99% of larvae, however, were collected from within rivers, with very few larvae being collected from the lakes. A comparison of two spawning seasons revealed that the year with higher freshwater flows also had greater spawning activity and higher concentrations of larvae. Interestingly, there was a significant relationship between the distribution of eggs and larvae with the level of stratification. The highest concentrations of larvae occurred at sites with a difference in bottom and surface salinities of 1520. This study demonstrates that despite A. butcheri spawning in the lakes and rivers, it is only locations with a halocline that function as larval nursery habitat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available