4.4 Article

Effect of acclimation temperature on the upper thermal tolerance of Colorado River cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus: thermal limits of a North American salmonid

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 7, Pages 2420-2433

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03287.x

Keywords

climate change; critical thermal maxima; local adaptations; Rocky Mountains

Funding

  1. USDA
  2. Colorado State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an effort to explore the thermal limitations of Colorado River cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus, the critical thermal maxima (Tcmax) of 1+ year Lake Nanita strain O. c. pleuriticus were evaluated when acclimated to 10, 15 and 20 degrees C. The mean +/- s.d.Tcmax for O. c. pleuriticus acclimated to 10 degrees C was 24.6 +/- 2.0 degrees C (n = 30), for 15 degrees C-acclimated fish was 26.9 +/- 1.5 degrees C (n = 23) and for 20 degrees C-acclimated fish was 29.4 +/- 1.1 degrees C (n = 28); these results showed a marked thermal acclimation effect (Q10 = 1.20). Interestingly, there was a size effect within treatments, wherein the Tcmax of larger fish was significantly lower than that of smaller fish acclimated to the same temperature. The critical thermal tolerances of age 0 year O. c. pleuriticus were also evaluated from three separate populations: Lake Nanita, Trapper Creek and Carr Creek reared under common-garden conditions prior to thermal acclimation. The Trapper Creek population had significantly warmer Tcmax than the Lake Nanita population, but that of the Carr Creek fish had Tcmax similar to both Trapper Creek and Lake Nanita fish. A comparison of these O. c. pleuriticus Tcmax results with those of other stream-dwelling salmonids suggested that O. c. pleuriticus are less resistant to rapid thermal fluctuations when acclimated to cold temperatures, but can tolerate similar temperatures when acclimated to warmer temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available