4.5 Article

Prostaglandin E2 promotes human cholangiocarcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion through the upregulation of β-catenin expression via EP3-4 receptor

Journal

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 715-726

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4043

Keywords

prostaglandin E2; beta-catenin; EP3R isoforms; cholangiocarcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172003]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is involved in cholangiocarcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion through E prostanoid receptors, including EP1, EP2 and EP4. However, the functions and the mechanisms of those splice variants of EP3 receptors in promoting liver cancer cell growth and invasion remain to be elucidated. In our previous studies, four isoforms of EP3 receptors, EP3-4, EP3-5, EP3-6 and EP3-7 receptors, were detected in CCLP1 and HuCCT1 cells: However, the functions of these receptors in these cells have yet to be determined. It was reported that p-catenin is closely correlated with malignancy, including cholangiocarcinoma. The present study was designed to examine the effects of 4-7 isoforms of EP3 in promoting cholangiocarcinoma progression and the mechanisms by which PGE2 increases beta-catenin protein via EP3 receptors. The results showed that PGE2 promotes cholangiocarcinoma progression via the upregulation of beta-catenin protein, and the EP3-4 receptor pathway is mainly responsible for this regulation. These findings reveal that PGE2 upregulated the cholangiocarcinoma cell beta-catenin protein through the EP3-4R/Src/EGFR/PI3K/AKT/GSK-3 beta pathway. The present study identified the functions of EP3 and the mechanisms by which PGE2 regulates beta-catenin expression and promoted cholangiocarcinoma cell growth and invasion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available