4.6 Article

Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products

Journal

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.105

Keywords

phthalates; epidemiology; personal exposure

Funding

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-ES09916, MO1-RR00400, MO1-RR0425]
  3. State of Iowa to the University of Iowa [18018278, 1RC2ES018736-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several phthalates, particularly diethyl phthalate (DEP) and di-n-butyl phthalate, can be used in personal care products (PCPs) to fix fragrance and hold color. We investigated associations between women's reported use of PCPs within the 24 h before urine collection and concentrations of several urinary phthalate metabolites. Between 2002 and 2005, 337 women provided spot urine samples and answered questions regarding their use of 13 PCPs at a follow-up visit 3-36 months after pregnancy. We examined associations between urinary concentrations of several phthalate metabolites and use of PCPs using linear regression. Use of individual PCPs ranged from 7% (nail polish) to 91% (deodorant). After adjusting for age, education, and urinary creatinine, women reporting use of perfume had 2.92 times higher (95% CI: 2.20-3.89) concentration of rnonoethyl phthalate (MEP; the primary metabolite of DEP) than other women. Other PCPs that were significantly associated with MEP concentrations included: hair spray, nail polish, and deodorant. MEP concentrations increased with the nurnber of PCPs used. PCP use was widespread in this group of recently pregnant women. Women's use of PCPs, particularly of perfumes and fragranced products, was positively associated with urinary concentration of multiple phthalate metabolites. Joumal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 197-206; doi:10.1038/jes.2012.105; published online 21 November 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available