4.6 Article

Metal sources and exposures in the homes of young children living near a mining-impacted Superfund site

Journal

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2011.21

Keywords

house dust; indoor air pollution; metals; mine waste; residential exposures; Tar Creek Superfund Site

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [P42-ES016454, K23 ES000381]
  2. NIEHS Center [2 P30-ES 00002]
  3. NIEHS Children's Center [1 P01-ES012874]
  4. US EPA STAR Research Assistance Agreement [RD-83172501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Children living near hazardous waste sites may be exposed to environmental contaminants, yet few studies have conducted multi-media exposure assessments, including residential environments where children spend most of their time. We sampled yard soil, house dust, and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter o2.5 in 59 homes of young children near an abandoned mining area and analyzed samples for lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and manganese (Mn). In over half of the homes, dust concentrations of Pb, Zn, Cd, and As were higher than those in soil. Proximity to mine waste (chat) piles and the presence of chat in the driveway significantly predicted dust metals levels. Homes with both chat sources had Pb, Zn, Cd, and As dust levels two to three times higher than homes with no known chat sources after controlling for other sources. In contrast, Mn concentrations in dust were consistently lower than in soil and were not associated with chat sources. Mn dust concentrations were predicted by soil concentrations and occupant density. These findings suggest that nearby outdoor sources of metal contaminants from mine waste may migrate indoors. Populations farther away from the mining site may also be exposed if secondary uses of chat are in close proximity to the home. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 495-505; doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.21; published online 18 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available