Journal
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 1542-1549Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0014492
Keywords
interval estimation; temporal binding; time perception
Categories
Funding
- EPSRC [EP/C004469/1]
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C004469/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Several recent studies (e.g., Haggard, Aschersleben, Gehrke, & Prinz, 2002; Haggard & Clark, 2003; Haggard, Clark, & Kalogeras, 2002) have demonstrated a Temporal Binding effect in which the interval between an intentional action and its consequent outcome is subjectively shorter compared to equivalent intervals that do not involve intentional action. The bulk of the literature has relied on the Libet Clock (Libet, Gleason, Wright, & Pearl, 1983; but see also Engbert & Wohlschlager, 2007; Engbert, Wohlschlager, Thomas, & Haggard, 2007; Engbert, Wohlschlager, & Haggard, 2008). Here we demonstrate that Temporal Binding is a robust finding that can also be reliably achieved with a Magnitude Estimation procedure, and that occurs over intervals far greater than those previously explored. Implications for the underlying mechanisms are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available