4.7 Article

Sox5 and c-Maf cooperatively induce Th17 cell differentiation via RORγt induction as downstream targets of Stat3

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 211, Issue 9, Pages 1857-1874

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20130791

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Japanese Government, Global COE Program (Global Center for Education and Research in Immune System Regulation and Treatment)
  3. LGS (Leading Graduate School at Chiba University) Program, MEXT, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461461, 25860351, 26461486, 26461184, 26461460, 26221305, 24390207] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stat3 signaling is essential for the induction of ROR gamma t and subsequent Th17 cell differentiation. However, the downstream targets of Stat3 for ROR gamma t expression remain largely unknown. We show here that a novel isoform of Sox5, named Sox5t, is induced in Th17 cells in a Stat3-dependent manner. In vivo, T cell-specific Sox5-deficient mice exhibit impaired Th17 cell differentiation and are resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and delayed-type hypersensitivity. Retrovirus-mediated induction of Sox5 together with c-Maf induces Th17 cell differentiation even in Stat3-deficient CD4(+) T cells but not in ROR gamma t-deficient CD4(+) T cells, indicating that Sox5 and c-Maf induce Th17 cell differentiation as downstream effectors of Stat3 and as upstream inducers of ROR gamma t. Moreover, Sox5 physically associates with c-Maf via the HMG domain of Sox5 and DNA-binding domain of c-Maf, and Sox5 together with c-Maf directly activates the promoter of ROR gamma t in CD4(+) T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that Sox5 and c-Maf cooperatively induce Th17 cell differentiation via the induction of ROR gamma t as downstream targets of Stat3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available