4.7 Article

Frequent disruption of the RB pathway in indolent follicular lymphoma suggests a new combination therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 211, Issue 7, Pages 1375-1387

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20132120

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [R01-CA142798-01]
  2. P30 supplemental award
  3. American Cancer Society [RSG-13-048-01-LIB]
  4. Leukemia Research Foundation
  5. Louis V. Gerstner Foundation
  6. Geoffrey Beene Cancer Center
  7. Society of MSKCC
  8. Starr Cancer Consortium [I4-A410]
  9. Lymphoma Research Foundation
  10. NCI SPECS [UO1 CA 84967]
  11. SCOR from The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  12. MSKCC Translational-Integrative Research Fund
  13. NCI careeer developmental grant [1k99CA175179-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of cell cycle controls is a hallmark of cancer and has a well-established role in aggressive B cell malignancies. However, the role of such lesions in indolent follicular lymphoma (FL) is unclear and individual lesions have been observed with low frequency. By analyzing genomic data from two large cohorts of indolent FLs, we identify a pattern of mutually exclusive (P = 0.003) genomic lesions that impair the retinoblastoma (RB) pathway in nearly 50% of FLs. These alterations include homozygous and heterozygous deletions of the p16/CDKN2a/b (7%) and RB1 (12%) loci, and more frequent gains of chromosome 12 that include CDK4 (29%). These aberrations are associated with high-risk disease by the FL prognostic index (FLIPI), and studies in a murine FL model confirm their pathogenic role in indolent FL. Increased CDK4 kinase activity toward RB1 is readily measured in tumor samples and indicates an opportunity for CDK4 inhibition. We find that dual CDK4 and BCL2 inhibitor treatment is safe and effective against available models of FL. In summary, frequent RB pathway lesions in indolent, high-risk FLs indicate an untapped therapeutic opportunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available