4.7 Article

The link between antibodies to OxLDL and natural protection against pneumococci depends on DH gene conservation

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 210, Issue 5, Pages 875-890

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20121861

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Alabama at Birmingham [AR43311, CA13148]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH-AI048115, AI088498, AI090742, AI021458, AI14782, AI100076-01]
  3. German Research Council [Transregio 22, A17]
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)/Brazil
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  6. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  7. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior/Brazil
  8. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selection and physiological production of protective natural antibodies (NAbs) have been associated with exposure to endogenous antigens. The extent to which this association depends on germline NAb sequence is uncertain. Here we show that alterations in germline D-H sequence can sever the association between the production of self-reactive NAbs and NAbs that afford protection against a pathogen. In unmanipulated hosts, the availability of the evolutionarily conserved DFL16.1 gene segment sequence profoundly affected the serum levels of NAbs against bacterial phosphorylcholine but not oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Mice with partially altered DFL16.1 sequence could use N nucleotides to recreate the amino acid sequence associated with the classical protective T15 idiotype-positive NAbs, whereas those without DFL16.1 could not. DFL16.1 gene-deficient mice proved more susceptible to challenge with live Streptococcus pneumoniae. Our findings indicate that although production of self-reactive NAbs can be independent of germline DH sequence, their capacity to provide protection against pathogens cannot. The potential relevance of these findings for the rational design of vaccines is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available