4.7 Article

Anti-CD3 therapy permits regulatory T cells to surmount T cell receptor-specified peripheral niche constraints

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 207, Issue 9, Pages 1879-1889

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20100205

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI051530-07]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) [4-2007-1057]
  3. Young Chair
  4. Joslin Diabetes Center's National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  5. JDRF Center on Immunological Tolerance in Type-1 Diabetes at Harvard Medical School
  6. Iacocca Foundation
  7. German Research Foundation [FE 801/1-1]
  8. Charles King Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment with anti-CD3 is a promising therapeutic approach for autoimmune diabetes, but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Foxp3(+) regulatory T (T reg) cells may be involved, but the evidence has been conflicting. We investigated this issue in mice derived from the NOD model, which were engineered so that T reg populations were perturbed, or could be manipulated by acute ablation or transfer. The data highlighted the involvement of Foxp3(+) cells in anti-CD3 action. Rather than a generic influence on all T reg cells, the therapeutic effect seemed to involve an similar to 50-60-fold expansion of previously constrained T reg cell populations; this expansion occurred not through conversion from Foxp3(-) conventional T (T conv) cells, but from a proliferative expansion. We found that T reg cells are normally constrained by TCR-specific niches in secondary lymphoid organs, and that intraclonal competition restrains their possibility for conversion and expansion in the spleen and lymph nodes, much as niche competition limits their selection in the thymus. The strong perturbations induced by anti-CD3 overcame these niche limitations, in a process dependent on receptors for interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-7.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available