4.7 Article

Delayed protection by ESAT-6-specific effector CD4+ T cells after airborne M-tuberculosis infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 205, Issue 10, Pages 2359-2368

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20080353

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) F32 [AI074248, AI53417, AI0677359]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH [HHSN266200400091C]
  3. Colorado State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection induces complex CD4 T cell responses that include T helper type 1 (Th1) cells and regulatory T cells. Although Th1 cells control infection, they are unable to fully eliminate M. tuberculosis, suggesting that Th1-mediated immunity is restrained from its full sterilizing potential. Investigation into T cell-mediated defense is hindered by difficulties in expanding M. tuberculosis-specifi c T cells. To circumvent this problem, we cloned CD4(+) T cells from M. tuberculosis -infected B6 mice and generated transgenic mice expressing a T cell receptor specific for the immunodominant antigen early secreted antigenic target 6 (ESAT-6). Adoptively transferred naive ESAT-6 -specific CD4(+) T cells are activated in pulmonary lymph nodes between 7 and 10 d after aerosol infection and undergo robust expansion before trafficking to the lung. Adoptive transfer of activated ESAT-6 -specific Th1 cells into naive recipients before aerosol M. tuberculosis infection dramatically enhances resistance, resulting in 100-fold fewer bacteria in infected lungs. However, despite large numbers of Th1 cells in the lungs of mice at the time of M. tuberculosis challenge, protection was not manifested until after 7 d following infection. Our results demonstrate that pathogen-specific Th1 cells can provide protection against inhaled M. tuberculosis, but only after the first week of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available